the CORE lab
  • RESEARCH
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • PEOPLE
  • IN THE NEWS
  • CONTACT

Publications


Papers are linked solely as a convenience to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical works on a non-commercial basis. Copyright is maintained by authors or publishers, and it is understood that persons accessing this information will adhere to the terms of the copyright and will not repost or disseminate without explicit permission.
Picture
CURRICULUM VITAE
Schumann, K., & Dragotta, A. (née Vazeou-Nieuwenhuis). (In Press). Empathy as a predictor of high-quality apologies. European Journal of Social Psychology.

Leunissen, J., Schumann, K., & Sedikides, C. (In Press). Self-protection predicts lower willingness to apologize. Journal of Social Psychology. 

Schumann, K., & Walton, G. (In Press). Rehumanizing the self after victimization: The roles of forgiveness versus revenge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Koetke, J., Schumann, K., & Porter, T. J. (In Press) Intellectual humility as a predictor of news literacy skills for COVID-19 misinformation. Social Psychological and Personality Science.
 
Koetke, J., Schumann, K., & Porter, T. J. (In Press). Trust in science increases conservative support for social distancing. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. 

Schumann, K., & Dragotta, A. (née Vazeou-Nieuwenhuis). (In Press). Is moral redemption possible? The effectiveness of public apologies for sexual misconduct. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.  ​PDF
 
Porter, T. J., Schumann, K., Selmeczy, D., Trzesniewski, K. (2020). Intellectual humility predicts mastery behaviors when learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 80.  PDF
 
Schumann, K. (2020). A force for good: When and why religion predicts prosocial behavior. Journal of Moral Theology, 9, 34-50.  PDF
 
Schumann, K. (2019). Apologies as signals for change? Implicit theories of personality and reactions to apologies during the #MeToo movement. PLOS One, 14.  PDF

Schumann, K. (2018). The psychology of offering an apology: Understanding the barriers to apologizing and how to overcome them. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 74-78.  PDF

Vazeou-Nieuwenhuis, A., & Schumann, K. (2018). Self-compassionate and apologetic? How and why having compassion toward the self relates to a willingness to apologize. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 71-76.  PDF

Schumann, K. & Orehek, E. (2017). Avoidant and defensive: Adult attachment and quality of apologies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1-25.  PDF   

Porter, T. J. & Schumann, K. (2017). Intellectual humility enhances openness to learning about the opposing view. Self and Identity, 1-24.  PDF

Hornsey, M.J., Schumann, K., Bain, P.G., Blumen, S., Chen, S., Gomes, A., Guan, Y., Kashima, E., Lebedeva, N., & Wohl, M.J.A. (2017). Conservatives are more reluctant to give and receive apologies than liberals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 827-835.  PDF

Schumann, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2014). Who accepts responsibility for their transgressions? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1598-1610.  PDF

Schumann, K., Zaki, J., & Dweck, C. S. (2014). Addressing the empathy deficit: Beliefs about the malleability of empathy predict effortful responses when empathy is challenging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 475-493.  PDF

Schumann, K., McGregor, I., Nash, K. A., & Ross, M. (2014). Religious magnanimity: Reminding people of their religious belief system reduces hostility after threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 432-453.  PDF

Schumann, K. (2014). An affirmed self and a better apology: The effect of self-affirmation on transgressors’ responses to victims. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 89-96.  PDF

Laurin, K., Schumann, K., & Holmes, J. G. (2014). A relationship with God? Connecting with the divine to assuage fears of interpersonal rejection. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 77-85.  PDF

Schumann, K. (2012). Does love mean never having to say you’re sorry? Associations between relationship satisfaction, perceived apology sincerity, and forgiveness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 997-1010.  PDF

Schumann, K., & Ross, M. (2010). Why women apologize more than men: Gender differences in thresholds for offensive behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 1649-1655.  PDF
​
Schumann, K., & Ross, M. (2010). The benefits, consequences, and paradox of revenge. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 1193-1205.  PDF

Schumann, K., & Ross, M. (2010). The antecedents, nature and effectiveness of political apologies for historical injustices. In D.R. Bobocel, A.C. Kay, M.P. Zanna, & J.M. Olson (Eds.), The Ontario Symposium: Vol. 11 The Psychology of Justice and Legitimacy (pp. 299–324). New York, NY: Psychology Press.  PDF

Blatz, C. W., Schumann, K., & Ross, M. (2009). Government apologies for historical injustices. Political Psychology, 30, 219-241.  PDF
Picture
  • RESEARCH
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • PEOPLE
  • IN THE NEWS
  • CONTACT